Bohol Tribune
Opinion

Stare Decisis

By Atty. Julius Gregory B. Delgado

THE ANTI-TERRORISM ACT OF 2020

First of a Three-Part Series

On 26 February 2020, the Philippine Senate voted to pass Senate Bill No. 1083, otherwise known as “An Act to Prevent, Prohibit and Penalize Terrorism, Thereby Repealing Republic Act No. 9372, otherwise known as the ‘Human Security Act of 2007’”. On 30 May 2020, the House of Representatives voted upon in the plenary and passed House Bill No. 6875. Both measures are identical which means that there will be no Bicameral Conference needed. The enrolled bill is now with the President for signature. Several sectors denounced the passage of the law amidst the on-going crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. But before we make a stand on this proposed measure, let us closely examine the law by knowing what acts are punishable, the safeguards and guarantees of our civil liberties and the questionable provisions of the proposed law.

The proposed law punishes terrorism, which is defined and committed by the following acts:

Under the proposed law, if convicted, the accused will not be eligible for parole and cannot enjoy the benefits of the Good Conduct Time Allowance Law which shortens the sentence of a convict for good conduct while under detention.

Other acts made punishable are as follows:

  1. Recruiting another person to serve in any capacity in or with an armed force in a foreign state, whether the armed force forms part of the armed forces of the government of that foreign state or otherwise;
  1. For any person to travel or attempt to travel to a state other than his/her state of residence or nationality, for the purpose of perpetrating, planning, or preparing for, or participating in terrorism, or providing or receiving terrorist training;

Basically, what are punishable acts related terrorism are in Sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. There are other provisions, which while may result to criminal liability, are connected with the safeguards against abuses by State actors or law enforcement agencies. The exception being is a provision which penalizes an employee, official, or a member of the board of directors of a bank or financial institution, who after being duly served with a written order of authorization from the Court of Appeals, refuses to allow the examination of the deposits, placements, trust accounts, assets, and records of a terrorist or an outlawed group of persons, organization or associations, in accordance with Sections 25 and 26 (proscription or declaration of terrorist groups, organizations and associations).

As to which organizations or associations may be considered as terrorist groups, there is a process of proscription outlined in Sections 25-28 of the proposed law. Please note that while the Anti-Terrorism Council may, upon probable cause, label or declare a certain organization or association as terrorist group, it is the Court of Appeals, by process of proscription, which has the authority to define which organization or association is considered as terrorist group or engaged in acts constituting terrorism. Aside from those proscribed by the Court of Appeals, the proposed law mandates the Philippine Government to adopt the declared terrorist groups by the United Nations. Thus, while it is prohibited to join or recruit someone to join a terrorist group, it should be an organization or association proscribed by the Court of Appeals.

Related posts

Medical Insider – Dr. Cora E. Lim

The Bohol Tribune
4 weeks ago

The Young Mind

The Bohol Tribune
2 years ago

Medical Insider – Dr. Rhodora T. Entero

The Bohol Tribune
6 years ago
Exit mobile version